Police routinely fail to put their names into a database [USA Today 4/23] “In five states alone, law enforcement failed to provide information to the FBI about at least 2.5 million outstanding arrest warrants… Among them are tens of thousands of people wanted for violent offenses and other felonies.”
In the article they don’t even total up the number of felons free to purchase weapons. So much for the “instant background check”. Plus, not only do they not STOP purchases, they don’t prosecute felons who TRY to purchase. That’s right, just the act of a felon trying to buy a weapon is something they could be arrested for, and lazy and incompetent law enforcement won’t do that either.
But, they do keep coming after your gun.
Former justice Stevens wants to change the Constitution [USA Today 4/22] “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed”.
When the power elite has an issue they want to change, say smoking, gay marriage or gun control, they always get some old fart who has nothing to lose to start the ball rolling. That is why the controlled media gives all this attention to an inconsequential figure like John Stevens.
To most of us, the very idea of taking our guns are fighting words. But communists know that a lot can be accomplished in the long march. Look at the size of government? Our stupid long wars, abortion, illegal immigration is no longer a crime. Things that would have seemed ridiculous 50 years ago are now de rigueur. That is why propagandists have to control the media and the schools. Hit ‘em young, hit ‘em often.
Here in Iowa, how many times have the gun grabbers like Rekha Basu or Carlos Jayne stated that they just want “reasonable” gun control? Oh, they only want “sensible legislation”. Bull hockey. You can’t subdue an armed populace. Those bastards know that. They have to have your gun. They have thrown down the gauntlet.
Make no mistake about tyrants like Stevens and others on the left, in the very same article in which he proposes disarming you, he justifies government surveillance of the people. They always say that Stevens was nominated by a Republican. Bull hockey, he was nominated by Gerald Ford.
“Deal with the faults of others as gently as with your own.”
– Chinese Proverb
[If I had any, I would.]
24 But very early on Sunday morning the women went to the tomb, taking the spices they had prepared. 2 They found that the stone had been rolled away from the entrance. 3 So they went in, but they didn’t find the body of the Lord Jesus. 4 As they stood there puzzled, two men suddenly appeared to them, clothed in dazzling robes.
5 The women were terrified and bowed with their faces to the ground. Then the men asked, “Why are you looking among the dead for someone who is alive? 6 He isn’t here! He is risen from the dead! Remember what he told you back in Galilee, 7 that the Son of Man must be betrayed into the hands of sinful men and be crucified, and that he would rise again on the third day.”
Most amazingly, it was just this past week that I heard on the radio the answer to the “3 days” riddle that Christians have been struggling with as regards Jesus’ time in the tomb in relation to the Sabbath in the scripture. It was from a preacher who lived over 60 years ago and his show Dr. Barnhouse & the Bible. He said that during that week (Passover), the Wednesday was also a Sabbath day. Crucified on Wednesday, risen on Saturday, the regular Sabbath. He specifically mentioned he is not troubled at all by the Church having the tradition wrong as regards good Friday and Easter Sunday. It all made sense to me as I have heard some of the other contortions to try and get the days to come out right.
Hi Eda, trebuie să spune-mi ceva despre tine, ai fost frumos destul ca să-l lovească pe mai multe din posturile mele, şi EU sunt curios cum cineva din Romania chiar aflat despre blogul meu minut putin. Vă place parea neobisnuita pentru un poet (sau astfel încât I-ar fi crezut). Jim
“It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.”
[François Marie Arouet] (1694-1778)
“To argue against any breach of liberty from the ill use that may be made of it, is to argue against liberty itself, since all is capable of being abused.”
– Lord George Lyttleton
“The test for whether one is living in a police state is that those who are charged with enforcing the law are allowed to break the laws with impunity.”
– Jon Roland
(1944-) founder of the Constitution Society
[Waco, Ruby Ridge, our borders... even on NPR the other day there was the audio from the cop mikes as they rousted a homeless guy (James Boyd) in a tent in Albuquerque, NM. He didn't comply fast enough with their shouted commands to put his hands behind his head. They shot him dead. The fact that he was unarmed and wasn't actually a threat to anyone doesn't seem to trouble the citizenry. Cops just put forth their typical defense, "He could have had a gun!" Yeah... he could have had a lot of things, but he didn't. Why did you shoot him? The fact that there are slob cops is not the real shocker, it is that they are allowed to walk. Where are the citizen review boards? Oh that's right, the cop shops assure us we don't need them. This deadly ignorance of the populace wouldn't be so bad, but it is taking me with them. In Santa Rosa, California the cops murdered 13 year old Andy Lopez as he walked home with his toy replica gun. Everybody walked. The other little key ingredient to all this, is where is your precious "conservative" talk radio host during all this? Deafening silence. - Jim Roach]
["Mexican Authorities Arrest Vigilante Leader", Sunday Des Moines Register 4/6.] Years ago I had read where the people in the interior of Mexico were demonstrating for the right to possess firearms. Their message to the government was, “if you aren’t going to protect us, let us protect ourselves”.
Now 15 years later, they have. The Mexican government was so incompetent and corrupt, the Mexican people in the region of Yurecuaro (Michoacán), got hold of weapons, formed their own vigilante groups and kicked out the drug cartels. Evidently there was some bickering between groups, and THEN the Mexican government steps in to arrest one of the leaders Enrique Hernandez Salcedo.
Doesn’t that about figure? Decades of drug cartels shooting up the landscape and terrorizing the villagers, and the corrupt Mexican government is nowhere to be found. But they CAN be found when it comes time to arrest the vigilantes.
It reminds me of our own outlaw government. They are completely impotent against inner city drug gangs and controlling our borders, but they WILL infiltrate and takedown patriot groups and militias. They can spy on Americans. They can invade our privacy. They can read our emails and listen to our phone calls, but can they stop a Boston bombing? Nope. Can they bust child prostitution rings in the large metropolitan areas? Nope. Can they bust all those child porn internet sites? Nope. But they can inflate charges against somebody like Randy Weaver and bust him. Stopped a real crime wave there they did.
The governments of Mexico and the United States may be structured vastly different, but the people running them are exactly the same.
“In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer. There is no country in the world where so many provisions are established for them; so many hospitals to receive them when they are sick or lame, founded and maintained by voluntary charities; so many alms-houses for the aged of both sexes, together with a solemn general law made by the rich to subject their estates to a heavy tax for the support of the poor. Under all these obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use their best endeavours to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of this burthen? — On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving them a dependance on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty.”
– Benjamin Franklin
(1706-1790) US Founding Father
Source: On the Price of Corn, and Management of the Poor, London Chronicle, November 29, 1766 [Liberty Quotes]