Blogs I Follow
Blogs I Follow
- Lucas Le
- Gourmet Tommy
- Safira's Journey
- Rhythm In Life
- Little Fears
- Celestial Priestess's Fourth Density Journal
- Classy Puppies
- simple Ula
- History Present
- Truth Disclosed
- Madison Richards
- Michelle Lambert
- STUDENT CRACKPOT NEWS UK
- Ricardo Sexton
- An Obvious Oblivion Blog
- Faisal khan
- Emily Padilla
- Fun Wunderlust
- Just Wunderlust
- Wild Puppy Dogs
- Immortal words. Mortal me.
- The Lovely Cats
- ♥Drops of Human♥
- Cute Animal Lover
- Electric Music of the Muses ©️
- Marvelous Dogs
- AMERICA ON COFFEE
- Gyms and Fitness
- Cats Being Cats
- Paradiso con due dita...
- With love
- Cafe Book Bean
- When Timber Makes One Still
- Agape: Lifestyle Blog
- NEW BIRTH !!!!!@ InclusionChurch
- Cartea cu desene
- Amazing Things Can Happen
- The Recipe Diary
loshame on Power concedes nothing without… Robin Porter on The Nora DeBolt collection and… Brenda on The Nora DeBolt collection and… Marcia on Hallmark Channel creates Chris… Jessica on Hallmark Channel creates Chris…
- 75,739 hits
- 2nd Amendment
- Computers and Internet
- Food and drink
- Gold, Stocks & Finances
- Health and wellness
- Life Liberty Property
- Movies & the Arts in Iowa
- News and politics
- Radio/TV/Internet & communications
- Sports & Games
- Stocks & Finances
- Upcoming Events
It was reported today on the radio, that Iowa bar owners were
trying to block the States immediate implementation of the ban
on the smoking of tobacco cigarettes.
One bar owner was quoted as saying her income was off 90 %.
The State responded by saying a University of Iowa report refutes such
#1, an owner saying revenue is down 90 %, is not anecdotal.
#2, if banning cigarettes is such a good idea, why didn’t the State
ban them at Prairie Meadows????? They wrote in an exemption
for their gambling parlor!
#3, I never saw a report run a business.
But all that is irrelevant. Their suit should not be about their profits.
Liberals despise private enterprise. It should not be about whether
second hand smoke is bad for people or not. It may not be, but you
ain’t gonna win that battle.
The whole single solitary issue in this fight comes down to one idea-
Private Property Exists In This Country, Or It Doesn’t!
They either get rid of the private property stealing phrase,
"public places", or they don’t. It either becomes clear that in a free
market, people either are allowed to make choices about what they engage
in, or they don’t. Business owners are either allowed to run business’s as
they see fit, or they are not. Consumers are either allowed to choose
what business’s they will support, or they’re not. Either the MARKET
is allowed to decide whether smoking goes on in business’s or not, or their
will be NOTHING that is safe from the dictatorial do-gooder powers
of the State.
Free Enterprise is supposed to be a series of voluntary
transactions. People are supposed to make a choice. The government
DIRECTING commerce, is by definition, not FREE!
It all comes down to that. And since no one on the side of business
understands that, they have lost.
It all comes down to maintaining the existence of private property rights.
Karl Marx knew that quite well.